So, what we learned yesterday is that the people in charge of finding out what kind of explosives were used in the Madrid attacks did exactly what they were supposed to do and on the report they clearly stablished the brand used by the criminals.
But then someone higher on the echelon decided to fabricate a different story for his own political benefit, unable to forsee that he was preparing his own debacle.
Aznar, by any chance, would you know who that person is?
Acebes?
What about you Palacio?
Or was it you Rajoy?
Here is the note from Berria:
But then someone higher on the echelon decided to fabricate a different story for his own political benefit, unable to forsee that he was preparing his own debacle.
Aznar, by any chance, would you know who that person is?
Acebes?
What about you Palacio?
Or was it you Rajoy?
Here is the note from Berria:
Police bomb disposal experts deny they pointed finger at ETA on March 11
They told the commission investigating the attack that they had said the bomb had contained dynamite and not Titadyne, habitually used by the armed group
Editorial Staff
According to declarations made yesterday by bomb disposal experts of the Tedax section of the Spanish Police before the commission investigating the March 11 Madrid bombings, it was known by 14.00 hours on the day of the attack that dynamite was the explosive used. But they denied that they had directly or indirectly pointed the finger at the armed organisation ETA. An Islamic group was responsible for the attack, which killed 200 people and injured hundreds when bombs were detonated on trains.
.... ... .
No comments:
Post a Comment