Thursday, April 26, 2007

Remembrance : Three Cities

This note appeared today at EITb:

70TH BOMBARDMENT ANNIVERSARY

Gernika, Buenos Aires and New York join for remembrance

04/26/2007

The manifesto 'Gernika for peace' was read out in the three cities, among others. 70 years after the massacre, the village defines itself as a city for peace and dialogue, for reconciliation and against violence.

On 26 April 1937, German and Italian fighter planes backing the fascist forces of General Francisco Franco in the Spanish Civil War levelled this historic Basque town, destroying the city and killing hundreds of citizens.

Remembering those tragic events, Gernika has been "a world city for peace" for a few hours.

Representatives of Basque institutions, among them the Basque premier, as well as the Peace Nobel Prize winner Adolfo Perez Esquivel and Chemistry Nobel winner Mario Molina went to Gernika to commemorate the anniversary. Representatives of cities that have suffered the consequences of war, Hiroshima, Coventry, Dresden, Hamburg, Warsaw or Stalingrad, attended the events at the Council House where the manifesto 'Gernika for peace' was read out in several languages.

Furthermore, a minute of silence in the memory of the victims of the bombardment opened the official events for the 70th anniversary of the destruction of the town. Afterwards, audiovisual documents of the time took those present to that tragic April 26 1937.

"Remember and pay tribute"

According to the mayor of the town, Miguel Angel Aranaz, the events "remember and pay tribute, one year more, to the victims of the bombardment, and spread internationally our wishes of peace and reconciliation."

Remembrance also had a more participative side, since all those who have moved to Gernika could enjoy an exhibition in which citizens could hang their wishes from a tree and contribute with their pictures to a photo-mosaic called "picture for peace" following the model of Picasso's Guernica.

Apologising

In turn, the spokeswoman for the Basque Government, Miren Azkarate, assured that Zapatero's Government and Parliament "have the legitimacy" to apologise for the crimes of Franco's regime in general and the bombardment of Gernika in particular.

Azkarate insisted on the idea that the town and Euskadi as a whole deserve so and reminded that Germany already apologised ten years ago.

Thus, Azkarate answered to socialists' critics on the aspiration that Spain's Government, inheritor of the Government of the Republic that rose up against Franco, apologises for the crimes committed by the dictator.


Is real sad to find out that Rodríguez Zapatero joins the long list of Spanish Prime Ministers who refuse to apologize for the crimes commited by Madrid against the Basque people, sad because there is those who thought that he really was being honest when he spoke about a dialogued solution to the Basque conflict. One thing though, if not for Gernika, sooner or later the PSOE must apologize for the GAL.

~ ~ ~

Gernika at The Spiegel

Oddly enough, Germans and Italians have apologized for their part in the massacre at Gernika 70 years ago. The Spaniards continue to refuse to accept their guilt, even more so, they are fully engaged in continuing their tactics against the Basque people.

Here you have an article about Gernika from the German media power house Spiegel. Sadly, the author refers to Gernika as a Spanish town, I guess he has mistaken Basque forgiveness for forgetfulness.

April 26, 2007

HITLER'S DESTRUCTION OF GUERNICA

Practicing Blitzkrieg in Basque Country

By Jörg Diehl

The attack quickly became the symbol of senseless destruction and for Nazi brutality: Exactly 70 years ago, the Condor Legion rained death down on the Spanish town of Guernica. For the Germans, it was little more than a training run.

"Guernica, city with 5,000 residents," the commander of the Condor Legion, Wolfram von Richthofen, noted curtly in his journal, "has been literally razed to the ground. Bomb craters can be seen in the streets. Simply wonderful." Not a word was written about the hundreds of dead.

April 26, 1937 was a Monday, a market day. Thousands of people were out on the streets of the Basque town of Guernica when around 4:30 in the afternoon, the bells suddenly began ringing. Air raid alarm! The first airplane appeared on the horizon, a German Heinkel 111 bomber -- in the cockpit was Lieutenant Rudolf von Moreau. When he was over the city center, von Moreau opened his bomb bay doors -- and death rained down on the city.

Waves of bombers and fighter planes followed. They dropped explosives, fragmentation bombs and incendiaries, a total of 31 tons of munitions fell on Guernica that day. For two and a half hours, the bombs rained down on the city from German and Italian warplanes -- "with a brutality that had never been seen before," as the president of the Basque "Autonomous Republic" Jose Antonio de Aguirre said three days later. "They scorched the city and fired machine guns at the women and children who fled in panic, resulting in numerous deaths."

Herding the people to slaughter

Eyewitness Juan Guezureya recalled the devastating afternoon in a 1974 conversation with two British reporters: "The two planes flew back and forth at a height of about 30 meters, like flying German Shepards driving the herd of people to the slaughter."

According to war reporter George L. Steer in the London daily the Times two days later, the strategy seemed clear. First, he wrote, came the heavy bombs and grenades to drive the population into panic. Then came the machine-gun strafing to drive them underground. Finally, came the incendiary bombs to destroy their hiding places.

The consequences of the attack were horrifying. Almost three-quarters of the city's buildings were destroyed and the center was almost completely wiped out. "When I entered Guernica after midnight," Steer wrote in his report, "houses were crashing on either side, and it was utterly impossible even for firemen to enter the center of the town. The hospitals of Josefinas and Convento de Santa Clara were glowing heaps of embers, all the churches except that of Santa Maria were destroyed, and the few houses which still stood were doomed. When I revisited Guernica this afternoon most of the town was still burning and new fires had broken out. About 30 dead were laid out in a ruined hospital."

The number of victims can only be guessed at. The Basque government said that 1,654 residents had been killed with a further 889 injured. Later investigations assume a much lower total -- 200 to 300 victims. What is clear, however, is that Guernica was one of the first cities ever to be destroyed by a bombing attack -- an attack carried out with no regard for women, children or the elderly. Three years before the destruction of Coventry and eight years before the bombing of Dresden, the pilots of Germany's Condor Legion broke with the basic military precept of doing no harm to civilians.

Blatant violation

"For the German air force, Guernica was a trial run on how one can spread horror and distress through attacks on cities and towns," Wolfgang Schmidt, air force expert at the Military History Research Institute in Potsdam, told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "Of course the bombing of Guernica was a blatant violation of human rights and had a terrorist character. It was accepted that civilians would be harmed."

Reporter Steer chose more explicit words to describe the raid: "The raid on Guernica is unparalleled in military history," he wrote in his Times report. "Guernica was not a military objective. A factory producing war material lay outside the town and was untouched. The object of the bombardment was seemingly the demoralization of the civil population and the destruction of the cradle of the Basque race."

The international reaction that followed the attack was intense. The entire world wanted to know who was responsible for the shameful act. The nationalist camp, led by subsequent Spanish dictator Francisco Franco, claimed that retreating Republicans had destroyed the city. When Nazi Defense Minister Werner von Blomberg asked the leadership of the Condor Legion who participated in the raid, he was greeted with the audacious reply: "No Germans."

But at the same time, the military sent specialists to the occupied city to collect suspicious leftovers from the hail of bombs. The pilots were also ordered to say nothing about the raid. In an effort to complete the deceit, the commander of the German expeditionary force unofficially aiding Franco radioed Berlin with a message indicating that the Condor Legion had fired on retreating enemy troops in the Guernica region and in the town itself.

Testing tactics under realistic conditions

When the deception failed to convince, the German army pled that the attack had been a tactical necessity. The aim of the operation, they said after the fact, had merely been to destroy bridges in the city to cut off the retreat of enemy soldiers. But as the world learned from then air force head Hermann Göring during the post-war Nuremberg Trials, the army's mission in Spain had also been to gain experience and to practice. There was an "opportunity to test under fire whether the materiel had been adequately developed," Göring said. In 2003, DER SPIEGEL published a document long thought to have been lost which proved that the primary reason the Germans were fighting on the Iberian Peninsula was to test out modern war materiel and tactics under realistic conditions.

The secret document was produced by Joachim von Richthofen, not related to his commander of the same name. He wrote a report for the Condor Legion as to the efficacy of German, Spanish and Italian bombs and provided suggestions as to how their performance could be enhanced. He described Guernica as a planned operation: "First came the incendiary bombs which set a number of roofs on fire." After that, he wrote, "followed the 250-kilogram heavy explosives" in order to "destroy water pipes thus hindering the extinguishing of the fires." He complained that the number of direct hits wasn't terribly high and could be improved. He said nothing, however, about the fact that numerous bridges and factories survived the raid unharmed.

Since then, it has been clear that the Germans saw the Spanish Civil War merely as a gigantic training camp. Some 19,000 soldiers -- officially all were volunteers -- were cycled through the war zone by the Nazis. "Two years of combat experience are more useful than 10 years of peacetime training," a German general summarized.

The commander of Condor Legion, Wolfram von Richthofen, eventually rose to the position of field marshal in Hitler's military machine. He died just weeks after the end of World War II. In his journal about the Spanish operation, he noted on April 28, 1937: "In the evening came the report that Guernica had been razed to the ground. No plans so far for tomorrow."

What does Etxaniz has to say about the reports by those who took part in the Luftwaffe's raid over Gernika? His claim that there was only 120 mortal victims relies on his premise that people had time to run for cover. Well, seems like Joachim von Richtofen proved him wrong.

Yes, and this is why the Basque people must be considered among the peoples of Europe that fell victim to the Nazi murderous machinery, so those who today insist in decreasing the number of victims of the bombing can be prosecuted for denying or minimizing Nazi crimes.

~ ~ ~

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Cider

A refreshing article from EITb:

Basque cider

The cider elaborated in the Basque Country nowadays is different from the cider manufactured elsewhere.

The real origin of cider cannot be traced exactly, but many historians say it was first elaborated in Egypt in the times before Christ. Other researchers say its origin was among the Celts in Europe. Nevertheless, it was the Arabs that made it known throughout the world and spread its techniques of production.

The native cider of the Basque Country is the Natural Cider or Hard Cider, which is exclusively manufactured using different kinds of apples. However, the cider manufactured in the rest of the countries is carbonated or champagne cider. The latter is more artificial, and its ingredients are a mix of apple juice, must and extracts, to which gas and sweeteners are added.

Cider houses are usually "baserris" -or country houses- mostly located in Gipuzkoa, which have facilities for the preparation and bottling of cider, and a space for the "kupelas" (barrels) and long tables where patrons can taste the specialities (cod omelette, fried cod with green peppers, and barbecued steak). The season begins in January and finishes mid-April.

During these months, it has become a tradition for the Basque people to come to these cider temples to practice the "txotx" ritual, which is extremely beautiful and peculiar. The owner of the cider house chooses a "kupela" (barrel) and he yells out "txotx," thus inviting all those attending to taste the cider. Consumption of cider is unlimited.

.... ... .

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Independence Dates

A strategy often used against Euskal Herria (the Basque Country) by the French, the Spaniards and their chorus of enablers is the one in which they make you believe that the independence of a nation is a rare occurrence these days. Well, I provide you with the list of countries that have obtained their independence from the 1950's until today:
1950-1959

December 24, 1951/Libya/from Italy
November 9, 1953/Cambodia/from France
January 1, 1956/Sudan/from Egypt and UK
March 2, 1956/Morocco/from France
March 20, 1956/Tunisia/from France
March 6, 1957/Ghana/from UK
August 31, 1957/Malaysia/from UK
October 2, 1958/Guinea/from France

1960-1969

January 1, 1960/Cameroon/from French-administered UN trusteeship
April 4, 1960/Senegal/from France
April 27, 1960/Togo/from French-administered UN trusteeship
June 26, 1960/Madagascar/from France
June 26, 1960/Somaliland/from UK
June 30, 1960/Democratic Republic of the Congo/from Belgium
July 1, 1960/Somalia/from the Italian-administered UN trusteeship
August 1, 1960/Benin/from France
August 3, 1960/Niger/from France
August 5, 1960/Burkina Faso/from France
August 7, 1960/Côte d'Ivoire/from France
August 11, 1960/Chad/from France
August 13, 1960/Central African Republic/from France
August 15, 1960/Republic of the Congo/from France
August 16, 1960/Cyprus/from UK
August 17, 1960/Gabon/from France
September 22, 1960/Mali/from France
October 1, 1960/Nigeria/from UK
November 28, 1960/Mauritania/from France
April 27, 1961/Sierra Leone/from UK
May 31, 1910/South Africa/from UK
June 19, 1961/Kuwait/from UK
December 9, 1961/Tanzania/from UK-administered UN trusteeship
January 1, 1962/Samoa/from New Zealand-administered UN trusteeship
July 1, 1962/Burundi/from UN trusteeship under Belgian administration
July 1, 1962/Rwanda/from Belgium-administered UN trusteeship
July 5, 1962/Algeria/from France
August 6, 1962/Jamaica/from UK
August 31, 1962/Trinidad and Tobago/from UK
October 9, 1962/Uganda/from UK
December 12, 1963/Kenya/from UK
July 6, 1964/Malawi/from UK
September 21, 1964/Malta/from UK
October 24, 1964/Zambia/from UK
February 18, 1965/The Gambia/from UK
July 26, 1965/Maldives/from UK
August 4, 1965/Cook Islands/became a self-governing parliamentary government in free association with New Zealand
August 9, 1965/Singapore/from Malaysian Federation
May 26, 1966/Guyana/from UK
September 30, 1966/Botswana/from UK
October 4, 1966/Lesotho/from UK
November 30, 1966/Barbados/from UK
November 30, 1967/South Yemen/from UK
January 31, 1968/Nauru/from the Australia-, NZ-, and UK-administered UN trusteeship
March 12, 1968/Mauritius/from UK
September 6, 1968/Swaziland/from UK
October 12, 1968/Equatorial Guinea/from Spain

1970-1979

June 4, 1970/Tonga/from UK
October 10, 1970/Fiji/from UK
August 15, 1971/Bahrain/from UK
September 3, 1971/Qatar/from UK
December 2, 1971/United Arab Emirates/from UK
December 16, 1971/Bangladesh/from Pakistan
July 10, 1973/The Bahamas/from UK
September 24, 1973/Guinea-Bissau/from Portugal (declaration)
February 7, 1974/Grenada/from UK
October 19, 1974/Niue/became a self-governing parliamentary government in free association with New Zealand
June 25, 1975/Mozambique/from Portugal
July 5, 1975/Cape Verde/from Portugal
July 6, 1975/Comoros/from France
July 12, 1975/São Tomé and Príncipe/from Portugal
September 16, 1975/Papua New Guinea/from the Australian-administered UN trusteeship
November 11, 1975/Angola/from Portugal
November 25, 1975/Suriname/from Netherlands
February 26, 1976/Western Sahara/former Spanish Sahara, from Spain. Ongoing conflict: military occupation in much of the territory by Morocco while the rest is administered by the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
June 29, 1976/Seychelles/from UK
June 27, 1977/Djibouti/from France
July 7, 1978/Solomon Islands/from UK
October 1, 1978/Tuvalu/from UK
November 3, 1978/Dominica/from UK
February 22, 1979/Saint Lucia/from UK
July 12, 1979/Kiribati/from UK
October 27, 1979/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines/from UK

1980-1989

April 18, 1980/Zimbabwe/from UK
July 30, 1980/Vanuatu/from France and UK
September 21, 1981/Belize/from UK
November 1, 1981/Antigua and Barbuda/from UK
September 19, 1983/Saint Kitts and Nevis/from UK
January 1, 1984/Brunei/from UK
October 21, 1986/Marshall Islands/from the US-administered UN trusteeship as Compact of Free Association takes effect
November 3, 1986/Federated States of Micronesia/from the US-administered UN Trusteeship as Compact of Free Association takes effect

1990-1999

March 11, 1990/Lithuania/from the Soviet Union
March 21, 1990/Namibia/from South African mandate
May 22, 1990/Yemen/merger North Yemen and South Yemen
October 3, 1990/Germany/unification of West Germany and East Germany
April 9, 1991/Georgia/from the Soviet Union
June 25, 1991/Croatia/from Yugoslavia
June 25, 1991/Slovenia/from Yugoslavia
August 20, 1991/Estonia/from the Soviet Union
August 21, 1991/Latvia/from the Soviet Union
August 24, 1991/Russia/from the Soviet Union, Russia is the successor state.
August 24, 1991/Ukraine/from the Soviet Union
August 25, 1991/Belarus/from the Soviet Union
August 27, 1991/Moldova/from the Soviet Union
August 30, 1991/Azerbaijan/from the Soviet Union
August 31, 1991/Kyrgyzstan/from the Soviet Union
September 1, 1991/Uzbekistan/from the Soviet Union
September 8, 1991/Republic of Macedonia/from Yugoslavia
September 9, 1991/Tajikistan/from the Soviet Union
September 21, 1991/Armenia/from the Soviet Union
October 27, 1991/Turkmenistan/from the Soviet Union
December 16, 1991/Kazakhstan/from the Soviet Union
March 1, 1992/Bosnia and Herzegovina/from Yugoslavia
April 27, 1992/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia/formed as self-proclaimed successor to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
January 1, 1993/Czech Republic/Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia
January 1, 1993/Slovakia/Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia
May 24, 1993/Eritrea/from Ethiopia
April 27, 1994/South Africa/Homelands reincorporated into South Africa and all races officially recognised as citizens
October 1, 1994/Palau/from the US-administered UN Trusteeship as Compact of Free Association takes effect

Since 2000

May 20, 2002/East Timor/From Portugal. East Timor was occupied by Indonesia between 1975-1999.
June 3, 2006/Montenegro/Dissolution of Serbia and Montenegro after a referendum supporting such a move in Montenegro
June 5, 2006/Serbia/Dissolution of Serbia and Montenegro - Serbia is the successor state


See? The most natural thing for an occupied nation is to seek its self-determination, a political right that is protected by the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

.... ... .

They Got the Signatures

Well, as expected they got the signatures they needed to present themselves to the upcoming elections, here you have the note by EITb:

MAY 27 ELECTIONS

basque leftist movement's election goups collect 82,500 signatures

04/22/2007

The numbers were unveiled during a meeting in Pamplona/Iruña, in which were presented the 50 candidates who will run in the forthcoming county elections of Navarre.

The election groups of the Basque leftwing nationalist movement collected 82,500 signatures in the Basque Country, going far beyond the needed ones.

About 14,000 signatures were gathered in Navarre, 32,500 in Gipuzkoa, 30,000 in Bizkaia and 6,000 en Alava.

In Pamplona/Iruña they collected 4,000, the same as in Donostia-San Sebastián, 6,000 in Bilbao and 3,500 in Vitoria-Gasteiz.

The numbers were unveiled during a meeting in Pamplona/Iruña, in which were presented the 50 candidates who will run in the forthcoming county elections of Navarre.

The list for Navarre's parliament, Nafarroako Abertzale Sozialistak, is headed by Pernando Barrena and Gloria Rekarte, member of the Pro-Amnesty movement, followed by Ainara Armendáriz, Jon Garai, Elena Urabaien, Mikel Soto, Miren Zabaleta, Patxi Erdozain, Begoña Zabala and Gorka Mayo.


Now lets wait and see the next movement by the spineless Zapatero government, too afraid to stand up against the Francoist vermin at the Partido Popular.

Or maybe it is no fear, but the fact that the PSOE has its own share of crimes against the Basque people.

~ ~ ~

70 Years of Revisionism

What does the Basque people get for the 70th anniversary of the bombings of Durango and Gernika?

And apology?

No way, the Spanish still think that the genocide they carried out in America were millions were murdered and dozens of civilizations were completely obliterated was actually something positive for humankind.

So what did we get?

Some good ol' Spanish press revisionism. Even better, this year they got a negationist with a Basque last name to rise the death toll from 12 to 122 victims, maybe is just that the dozen casualties given by Francisco Franco originally is an amount that is just not holding these days, so here comes this fella Etxaniz and tells the world that it is a hundred, give or take.

Here you have the note that appeared today at the Macon Telegraph:
Posted on Sun, Apr. 22, 2007
70 years later, Guernica holds secrets
By PAUL HAVEN - Associated Press Writer
GUERNICA, Spain --
Itziar Arzanegi can still hear the roar of the German warplane overhead, and see the old woman shaking her fists at the foreigners destroying her town. She remembers the look of horror on the woman's face as the plane swooped low, opened fire and cut her down.

It has been nearly 70 years since German and Italian fighter planes backing the fascist forces of Gen. Francisco Franco in the Spanish Civil War leveled this historic Basque town on April 26, 1937.

Myths and misinformation have shrouded the bombing from the outset, starting with the death toll, which historians have been gradually revising downward for decades. But Guernica has come to be seen as a foretaste of the aerial blitzes of World War II, immortalized in Pablo Picasso's "Guernica," one of the most iconic paintings of the 20th century.

That was just your average introduction to the bombing of Gernika, but here you have a couple of paragraphs that let you see just how little understanding of the Basque conflict the writer Paul Haven has:

But while the images of destruction are etched indelibly in the world's consciousness - and in the minds of a dwindling number of survivors - the 70th anniversary is causing barely a ripple in Spain itself. Little is planned to mark the event on a national level, and no major Spanish politicians are expected to attend a Mass, concert and wreath-laying ceremony for the dead in Guernica's town cemetery.

It is symptomatic of a country that has never come to grips with its Civil War past. Spain has become a cultural and economic powerhouse in recent years, but critics say its success has been built - quite literally - over the ruins of its greatest disaster.

Poor Paul Haven, he doesn't understand that Gernika is important to the Basques, not to the Spaniards. The Spaniards are not like the Germans that each opportunity they get they apologize to the Jewish community for the Nazi Holocaust, oh no, the Spaniards actually believe that they have done nothing wrong to the Basques.

You see Paul, there is many in Spain who simply refuse the idea that the Basque people have the right to their self-determination, so Spaniards do not see Gernika as a crime against humankind, let alone against the Basques. For them, the Basque Country must remain a part of One Spain Under God, whatever it takes, as many Gernikas as it takes. This is why no Spanish politician will be present at an event that is important to the Basques only because of what it meant to have a town that is considered the tangible representation of their ancient laws razed to the ground.

At least Mr. Haven explains why you can not consider Spain a democracy that overcame its fascist past, check these paragraphs:

"In Spain, we have changed on the outside - we've built new highways, shopping centers and successful multinational companies - but to change people's mentality on the inside has proven much more difficult," said Emilio Silva, president of an organization that leads efforts to exhume the bodies of civilians killed by Franco's forces in the 1936-9 war. Half a million people are believed to have died on all sides.

Silva said that many in the generation that lived through the war and Franco's victory learned that the best way to survive under the dictatorship was not to talk about it. Those who oversaw the country's transition to democracy following Franco's death in 1975 believed reconciliation meant burying the past.

But the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the war generation are starting to demand more openness, he said, adding: "A country without memory has no meaning at all."

Survivors of the Guernica bombing, their faces lined by age, say forgetting has never been an option for them.

Arzanegi was just 11 years old when the bombs started to fall. She fled to a pine grove on a hill above town and watched the inferno below. She and other villagers hid in the brush as the planes screamed overhead, until one woman could contain her anger no longer. She jumped out and started to scream at the sky, just as a plane was coming into view.

"There are many things we live through in our lives, and some of the details we forget, but that bombardment I cannot forget, not even for a single day," said Arzanegi. "As long as I live, the sight of that plane dropping down and machine-gunning that woman will be with me. It was so cruel, so unimaginable."

Only about 200 survivors are known to be alive today, according to Remembering Guernica, a non-governmental peace group based in the town. But the stories they tell of that day in their childhood are captivating and terrifying in their detail.

Luis Iriondo, 84, says he was separated from his family and hid in a bomb shelter in the center of town.

"There was no light, no ventilation, and there were so many people pressed together that it was impossible to breathe. I was frightened that a bomb would hit us and I would be buried alive," he said. In the end, he decided to take his chances on the streets: "Better to be machine-gunned than buried alive."

Pedro Balino was at the train station with a friend when he heard the sirens cry and saw the first plane fly overhead. The pair fled to the hills above town and watched the bombing from there. When it was over, he came down to find his family.

"After the bombing we came down from the hills, and at the entrance to Guernica we found eight or 10 guys who were dead or dying. One was missing his face, the other had no arm," said Balino. "Some of them I knew. They were young people, maybe 15 or 16 years old."

Why was a small, nonmilitary town picked for destruction?

The most popular theory is that it was sacred to the Basques, who had rejected Franco's overtures to join him and whose independent streak was detested by the Spanish general. Here Spanish kings would travel to stand under an oak tree and vow to respect an ancient code giving the Basques special rights.

The tree was not targeted and stood in one of the few places in town that survived the bombing. It finally succumbed to disease in 2005, replaced by a sapling from the original tree's acorn that stands today.

Today Guernica is a town of 15,000 nestled in a lush valley at the southern tip of an estuary that opens into the Bay of Biscay.

Franco denied any German or Italian planes were in Spain at the time of the attack, and claimed the Basques had destroyed the town themselves. When his troops took the town a few days after the bombing, they immediately set out to conceal all traces of the air attack, removing bullets and the casings of the incendiary and fragmentation bombs.

The town was rebuilt as quickly as possible - with drab new buildings rising on top of the ruins of the old. Residents say public works projects frequently uncover bones.

Though thousands of witnesses saw the attack, the dictator took his denial of responsibility with him to the grave.

Here you have the part were the Francoist revisionist with the last name initiates the new attack against the Basque memory of the Gernika bombing:

But there were myths on all sides, said Jose Angel Etxaniz, a historian linked to the town's museum who has spent nearly 20 years studying the bombardment. Chief among those myths was the belief that Guernica was the first and deadliest air assault on a civilian population in the Spanish Civil War.

On both counts, it was not.

After Hitler's Condor Division planes and Italian allies unleashed their payloads, reducing the town of mostly wooden houses to smoldering embers, the fleeing Basque government announced that 1,245 people had died, and that more than 800 had been injured.

But those numbers were mere guesswork. In the world's collective consciousness, Guernica became synonymous with the tens of thousands killed in subsequent bombings elsewhere.

The attack began when a single plane appeared on the horizon at about 3:30 p.m., dropping six bombs. In the 10 to 12 minutes before the first wave of bombers arrived, many of the 8,000 to 10,000 people in town at the time managed to flee into fields or bomb shelters.

Etxaniz said his team have meticulously pored over church and cemetery records and have been able to document 120 deaths from the bombing.

Nor was it the first time modern weaponry was used against a civilian population - German planes had unleashed a similar assault against the Basque town of Durango just three weeks earlier, killing 300 people.

Well, Mr. Etxaniz, what a relief, so the first time that the Fascist governments unleashed the terror of their modern weaponry was not in Gernika, it was in Durango. Now, that really makes a difference, after all, those killed in Gernika were Basques while those killed in Durango were... wait a minute, they were Basques also.

Hmm, am I paranoid or does it look like the Basques still hold the dubious "honor" of being the first population to fall prey to the killing machinery of those who believe they have the divine right to destroy a nation and its people just because.

And by the way, the first civilian victims of modern day airfare war tactics were the Kurdish when Winston Churchill ordered the first ever biological bombings of villages well behind the front lines during the 1920'3 British occupation of Iraq. But well, Churchill is supposed to be a hero, some sort of a Hitler nemesis, no matter that deep inside both were the same sort of scoundrel.

But wait, Etxaniz is not done yet, check this out:

But Guernica captured attention because of dramatic dispatches by foreign correspondents, chief among them George Steer of the London Times, who wrote of walls of flames visible for miles around.

"In the form of its execution and the scale of the destruction it wrought, no less than in the selection of its objective, the raid on Guernica is unparalleled in military history," he reported.

It was these accounts in the foreign press that caught the attention of Picasso, who was living in Paris at the time, Etxaniz said. Otherwise, the artist might well have picked a different subject for his signature painting.

Many believe Guernica was a dry run for Adolf Hitler's invasion of Poland and the start of World War II two years later. Soon a world that had never known urban savagery from the air would witness the horror falling on London, Warsaw, Berlin, Hiroshima.

Yet Guernica, whatever its final death toll, retains the power to shock, and its survivors say they hope their ordeal can still serve to warn the world away from war. Many have been active in opposing Spanish involvement in Iraq, and speaking out about other conflicts.

"What are the lessons of Guernica?" asked Balino, now 86, hunching his shoulders and resting his elbow on his knee as he considered the question. "Only that it should never happen again. That it should never be allowed to happen again."

No chances Etxaniz will listen to Balino's world, his ears are stuffed with the euros given to him by the Francoists who still call the shots in Spain.

~ ~ ~

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Support for Euskara

This article about the defense of Euskara comes to us via EITb:

Institutional support for Basque language

Even though in former times the Basque Country was privileged with a series of ancient rights, these were insufficient to protect the social use of Basque.

Institutional support is the last decisive factor in the sociolinguistic continuity and revitalisation of Basque. Even though in former times the Basque Country was privileged with a series of ancient rights, these were insufficient to protect the social use of Basque, as can be seen from what happened to the situation of the Basque language in Alava during the eighteenth century and Navarre during the first half of the nineteenth century.

With the exception of some specific action taken by the provincial governments during the first decades of the twentieth century and the brief interval during which the Basque Government was formed (1936) during the Spanish Civil War, there was no true institutional support for the language until the 1980's, once democracy had returned to Spain and the Statutes of Autonomy of the Basque Autonomous Community (1979) and Navarre (1982) were approved.

The successes obtained in the standardisation and modernisation of the language, its presence in the education system, culture, the media, the administration and business have been made thanks to the support from the Basque Autonomous Community and Navarre.

.... ... .

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Bias and Prejudice

One of the reasons why we decided to start this blog five years ago was the bias present in 99% of the articles about Euskal Herria published by the main stream media, namely, the big news agencies. Well, via The Washington Times we got this paradigmatic example of what we are talking about, an article by an anonymous author (that alone speaks about the lack of ethics that is rotting the journalistic profession) that highlights the vicious bias and prejudice against the Basque people:

Here you have it:

A job for Don Quixote

When most Americans hear the word Basque they think "terrorist." It's not quite fair, but that's what many Spaniards think, too. Basque terrorists kept their bargain for a ceasefire for nine months last year, but in December they detonated a car bomb in a parking garage at Madrid's Barajas International Airport, killing two and injuring dozens. Most Spaniards -- large majorities, by the polls -- blame not only the bombers, but the prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, as well for his coddling the terrorists, for naively taking them at their word that they would negotiate honorably while keeping their arms.

Lets start right here.

¿Americans the author says?

Well, news for him, Americans are all those who were born in the continent called America from Canada to Argentina, so, what he really needed to say was US Citizens, poor way to start an article available to readers outside the USA where ignorant and poor educated people think that they are the only "Americans" in the universe.

But lets see what the author states right away, he says that when US Citizens "hear the word Basque they think terrorist". Of course, thanks to articles like the one we are analyzing today which is actually not a fluke but part of an slanderous campaign designed and orchestrated from Madrid.

The author tries to avoid a law suit by stating that "is not quite fair", notice how he is not gracious enough to drop the "quite" but hey, it is because "that's what many Spaniards think, too". But of course, the Spaniards are the ones with an special interest in having the Basques appear as the scourge of Earth before the eyes of the international community, but since the Spaniards think it too, that is why is not quite fair instead of not fair.

The next part of the paragraph is directed against Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and it only shows who's behind the article penned by an US Citizen seeking to please the Spanish extreme right camp.

The author splurges using the word terrorist left and right, and then he wonders why "Americans" think that the words Basque and terrorist are synonyms. Check this out:

A terrorist organization called Basque Fatherland and Liberty, or ETA for short, took responsibility for the car bomb. ETA is often compared to the Irish Republican Army, but the comparison is not exact. What the two organizations have held in common is their ability to kill without conscience. ETA is a leftist, separatist group that demands an independent Basque state carved from northern Spain and southwest France. The U.S. State Department lists it as a terrorist organization. ETA has killed 800 innocents over a 40-year campaign, including four killings over the last four years, and they wield political clout well beyond their numbers.

Wait!

What happened to the IRA?

The author (we don't know if it is a male or a female) starts out with a comparison between ETA and the IRA but then says that "ETA is a leftist, separatist group that demands an independent Basque state carved from northern Spain and southwest France" without telling us what they IRA fought and is still fighting for, which in the author's own words would be "an unified and independent Irish state carved from England". But he simply drops the issue hoping we won't notice.

One more thing, he mentions that the State Department has ETA listed as a "terrorist" organization. News to the author, the US military and the CIA are actual terrorist organizations that spread death and destruction all over the globe to satisfy the plans for economic domination by Washington.

And the pearl: "ETA has killed 800 innocents over a 40-year campaign".

Thus the author becomes a Holocaust denier and anti-Semitic for ETA's first execution was carried out against Meliton Manzanas, the liaison between Franco's secret police and the Gestapo. This "innocent" individual was in charge of hunting down the Jewish and the Allied pilots being spirited away from Nazi occupied France into the Basque Country. Meliton turned in dozens of Jewish and downed Allied pilots to the Nazis while torturing and murdering hundreds of Basques men, women and children and torching down entire villages.

And since we are talking about "innocents", how about Admiral Carrero Blanco?

See, we think this is the reason why the author chose to remain anonymous. Admiral Carrero Blanco was hand picked by Francisco Franco to become his successor in his fascist regime, thus Admiral Carrero Blanco was in charge of perpetuating a genocidal regime that came to be thanks to the military support of non else than Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Carrero Blanco was a member of the regime that managed to be considered neutral during WWII when in fact it contributed men and resources to the Axis but that nevertheless is a minor participant in the Holocaust, a regime that sheltered Nazi officials after the war was over.

The "innocent" list also include members of the Spanish armed forces, mercenaries and drug dealers but since the author is an apologist of a deadly regime in cahoots with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy we understand why they are the good guys and who are the bad guys.

But as if what we've read so far is not enough, the author also exposes himself as a complete illiterate:

Most Spaniards hold Don Quixote, the famous tilter at windmills, as their comic ideal, but they regard ETA as real and dangerous. They are particularly angry about the prime minister's release from prison of an ETA terrorist convicted of 25 murders. Jose Ignacio De Juana Chaos -- no Don Quixote he -- was on a hunger strike when he was allowed to serve the final three years of his sentence in comfortable house arrest. The PM argued that this was better than transforming him to martyr in prison.


Huh?!

Don Quixote and ETA?

Seriously, first the ETA/IRA comparison and now this?

If you are going to resort to a world wide recognized character of Spanish literature to represent today's Spaniards at least try to keep it in the field of literature and come up with another literary character to represent the Basques. Which tells us that the author never read Don Quixote because as it happens, Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra provides with that character, but we will get to that.

First we would like to point out that Don Quixote is not (by any means) considered a "comic ideal" by the Spaniards, oh no, quite the opposite, Don Quixote represents the idealism of all what Spaniards consider conform their identity. Don Quixote is a Christ like figure that holds all the moral values and the chivalry of the "good" Spaniards, he will fight for the right thing by all means necessary.

Now, opposite to Don Quixote we have a brute, Sancho, who is uneducated and filthy... and a Basque. Yup, Spanish propaganda against the Basques is nothing new, goes back to Cervantes Saavedra who lived from 1547 until 1616, a period of time in which Navarre (the Basque kingdom) although reduced to its northern portion was still a sovereign state. And since the Basques have managed to keep the Spaniards from invading what was left of their kingdom after the defeat at Noain when they lost the southern portion seems like Cervantes Saavedra wanted to express the hateful resentment that the Spaniards held against the Basques by creating Sancho Panza to represent all what was wrong as opposed to Don Quixote who represented all what was right. Goebbels had so much to learn from Cervantes Saavedra.

If the author had read Don Quixote would know that, but he or she hasn't.

One more thing, the author went from the usual dishing out of misconceptions to plain out lying, de Juana did not hold a hunger strike over him being "awarded" with "a comfortable house arrest", he did it because after he had served the term of his conviction (when Spanish law requires only 75% of it) he was sentenced to another 12 years for writing two articles of opinion. Talk about freedom of expression in the Kingdom of Spain.

Then the article goes on and on repeating all the usual drivel, here you have it:

Terrorism, and the fear of it, has raised the temperature of the body politic despite an unusual chilly spring in Madrid. Debates and marches abound. So do reminders of past terrorist outrage. The government only last month dedicated an enormous glass memorial to the 191 slain and 1,800 injured at the Atocha railway station three years ago, and King Juan Carlos and Queen Sofia were there, along with Mr. Zapatero, but it hardly mellowed public antagonism toward the party in power. The Atocha Station terrorists turned out to be Islamist terrorists, angry that Spanish troops were part of George W. Bush's "coalition of the willing in Iraq," but the Spanish public is weary of living in fear of mayhem. They want all terrorists treated harshly. The anniversary offered the opposition, the conservative Popular Party, an occasion to put hundreds of thousands of angry Spaniards in the streets to rally against Mr. Zapatero's soft treatment of terrorists. Banners flying over a vast sea of angry demonstrators demanded: "No more concessions to ETA."

Ironies abound. Mr. Zapatero and the Socialists were regarded as having no chance to win office in 2004, but the Atocha Station bombings changed all that three days before the parliamentary elections. On winning the election and becoming prime minister, he quickly withdrew every Spanish soldier from Iraq. Now, although he's presiding over the strongest economy in nearly a decade, his softness toward terrorists, perceived or not, invites the punishment he inflicted on his predecessor.

Jose Aznar, the prime minister deposed by the Atocha Station bombers, sees signs of revivals of deep political division. He tells the Wall Street Journal that the Zapatero government gave the Madrid bombers what they wanted by withdrawing Spanish troops from Iraq, and he's appeasing further violence by courting ETA.

An exhibition of posters and photographs from the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) and Franco's subsequent decades of dictatorship, now on exhibit at the Reina Sophia Museum in Madrid, renders all that as history. But Mr. Aznar says the post-Franco bipartisan "compact is destroyed" and there is real danger in the "Balkanization of the country." He blames the Socialist government's encouragement of decentralization in the Basque country, Catalonia and other smaller regions, as well as the absence of a consistent foreign policy, for diluting a sense of national identity.

After the December ETA bombings, Mr. Zapatero conceded his mistakes in a speech to the nation: "There can be no dialogue with violence." But almost nobody trusts him now, and soon he must decide whether to allow the political wing of ETA, currently banned from politics, to take a new name and run candidates in local elections in May. That's a windmill that would break the lance of Don Quixote.

King Juan Carlos was the substitute for Carrero Blanco and that is how the Francoist regime has managed to rule over the Spanish State until today, which means that the Basques have been resisting against a fascist regime since 1936. But the author won't mention that either.

Anyway, if you want to learn what really took place just read all the posts tagged with "peace process".

.... ... .

Sunday, April 08, 2007

Udalbiltza : Unified Celebration

This text was sent to us by our friends from Udalbiltza:

UDALBILTZA
ABERRI EGUNA 2007


DECLARATION


THE MOMENT HAS COME TO ACT LIKE A NATION. FROM THE ABERRI EGUNA, LET US FACE TOGETHER THE CHALLENGE PRESENTED BY EUSKAL HERRIA’S NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION.

Today represents an important date in Euskal Herria’s national calendar: today is the Aberri Eguna, the day of Euskal Herria and the Basque citizenry. Today Euskal Herria constitutes a nation without statehood, given that the Spanish and French states refuse to accept it as such. Due to this situation, the Basque citizenry is not free, because it is not subject to the rights enshrined by the international rights’ declarations.

More so, the tendency by the Basque citizenry to allow divisions within itself has exercised a great influence in the difficult situation we live in. The time has come for us to overcome those divisions. The Basque citizenry will open a brand new age, but for this it is fundamental that we present ourselves as a nation, not only before the states that violate our national rights, but before Europe and the entire world. An Euskal Herria above any imposed borders, three million inhabitants, 685 municipalities, seven territories, and one Basque community in the Diaspora… one nation that pretends to regain its sovereignty.

It is because of this that, historically, the organization of a joined Aberri Eguna has been of great importance. We should recall the very first ones, the ones that took place before Franco’s uprising, the ones that took place after his death and the ones from the last few years; the success obtained during 1999 and 200 in hundreds of municipalities from the hand of Udalbiltza. Fortunately enough, dozens of municipalities have maintained this tendency and its model has been echoed successfully even within the Diaspora. This year, let us commend the great step taken thanks to the demonstration that, from the hand of renown Basque personalities has brought together Irun and Hendaia, for this constitutes proof that, although slowly, we advance in the right direction.

Nevertheless, this can not be the exception but the rule. We must learn how to take advantage of the opportunities presented to us today. Above all the apparent difficulties, the will of our society to overcome the conflict once and for all, becoming the driving force for the political process that will usher a new and more democratic stage, is gaining strength; and the right of Euskal Herria to organize itself as a nation, politically and institutionally, has achieved great acceptance.

Our people have seen its freedom of speech and its freedom to build its own institutional work frame denied, and it must regain them. Therefore, we can not waste the opportunity presented to us by the elections within a year of municipal representatives in the seven territories, because this is a chance, starting with the institutions that are closer to the citizenry, to initiate the democratic organization of this nation. We must learn to overcome the divisions produced within Udalbiltza and seize this historic opportunity to build Euskal Herria politically and institutionally.

Euskal Herria needs an institution like Udalbiltza, capable of gathering the strength of all of Euskal Herria to ensure that, living anywhere they may, the Basque citizens are enabled to take part in the present democratic process, being this one only the first stage in the national institutional process. In any case, for all of this to become a reality, with utmost respect to the principles approved in the Euskalduna palace, Udalbiltza most adequate itself in order to be able to respond to the new needs of Euskal Herria’s new era, becoming a democratic agent that supports peace and the political process, developing the compromise assumed in favor of all the rights for the entire citizenry, presenting Udalbiltza as the first national institution consolidated and permanent as required by our people, favoring the structural process of our nation.

Being that Udalbiltza’s contribution to Euskal Herria can be so significant, it is time that we take some steps together. The cooperation and the dialogue are vital, this is why, with the firm conviction that the time for compromise has arrive to all of us, we conclude this institutional declaration for this year’s Aberri Eguna celebration with an open call:

1.- We call upon all of Euskal Herria’s social, political and worker union agents to, in this crossroad, assume their own responsibility and, leaving behind all partisanship, acting as one people while encompassing the whole of Euskal Herria, establishing the necessary democratic agreements.

2.- We call upon all of the Basque citizens, faced with the importance of this present moment we all live in, and above all perceived barriers, to get involved both in the construction of Euskal Herria and the dynamics regarding the democratic resolution of the conflict that we’ve endured for so long.

3.- We call upon the two states that violate the rights bestowed upon us as Basque citizens and as a people to not only recognize them but also to respect the political rights of Euskal Herria.

4.- We call upon all nations and states around the world, and specially the European ones, to support and facilitate Euskal Herria’s political process, defending, acknowledging and guaranteeing the rights of the Basque citizenry enshrined in the international treaties created to protect these very rights.

5.- Finally, we call upon the leadership of the political parties present in Euskal Herria and upon those who will be present as candidates in this upcoming electoral process to vindicate the necessity to celebrate democratic elections, and also to defend the people’s will. More so, to strengthen their bonds and to make public their compromise to create a national institution that gathers within itself all of the municipal representatives.

Euskal Herria, April 8th of 2007


.... ... .

Pictures From The Unified Aberri Eguna

Here you have some pictures sent to me from Hazparne that show the unified Aberri Eguna celebration in the Hegoalde-Iparralde border:












.... ... .